Dr. Elliot Jacobs, MD

I cannot recommend Dr. Elliott Jacobs highly enough. I underwent gynecomastia surgery with him on August 2, 2024, after suffering from this condition since puberty at the age of 14. For 20 years, I dealt with the physical and emotional burden of gynecomastia before finally making the decision to change my life at 34 years old.When I went for a consultation in June 2024, I was immediately impressed by Dr. Jacobs’ expertise. He has dedicated his entire career to gynecomastia surgery, and as soon as I met him, I knew I was in the right hands. Committing to surgery can feel overwhelming, especially with a severe case like mine, but Dr. Jacobs made me feel completely confident.The surgery itself went incredibly smoothly. I followed every guideline he provided for both pre- and post-operative care, which made the process seamless. The day after my surgery, I had a follow-up visit, and despite it being a Friday procedure, Dr. Jacobs went above and beyond, scheduling a Zoom call with me on

Paid him over 10 thousand dollars after he told me he would 'remove the full gland and use fat flaps to fill in the concavities'. He ended up doing lipo only with no gland removal. When I later voiced my concerns about the left over gland, he told me it was just scar tissue, that he had removed all the gland, and to fly back down to Florida for a steroid shot. So I spent the money on a plane ticket and hotel for the night only for him to say 'your chest is perfect', refuse to look at it or feel it, and refuse to give a steroid shot. I just had revision surgery and not only had he not removed the gland, but had sucked out all the fat between the gland and skin making revision very challenging. When I posted about my experience online he responded by saying that he told me I might get lipo only but the anesthesia medication 'wiped my memory' even though my consultation was months prior. Also be aware that he was able to get my Google review removed somehow as well as other bad reviews.

From the ADA, a federal law which supersedes the state law to which the doctor claims to adhere: "State and local governments, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that serve the public generally must allow service animals to accompany people with disabilities in all areas of the facility where the public is normally allowed to go. For example, in a hospital it would be inappropriate to exclude a service animal from areas such as patient rooms, clinics, cafeterias, or examination rooms."

Incredibly unprofessional.